Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: [Evolution] Evolution 0.2 RPMs

[Jeff Bond <jeff pixelfusion co uk>]

Binary RPMs rock. I tried downloading source tarballs and while with
worked for me for the 0.1 release, doing the same with the 0.2 release
hosed my system. Took a fair while manually deleting dodgy libraries and
stuff to get a working gnome again. At least with RPMs you can easily
uninstall!

BTW, Im running evolution 0.2 (using the binary RPMS) and noticed that
the calendar and addressbook icons don't do anything. Is this a bug, or
are these just not implemented yet? Seems to send and receive mail OK,
and filters work for me, but I get seemingly random crashes when doing
things like creating new folders, and entering email settings.

Jeff




Darin Adler wrote:
> on 7/12/00 6:47 PM, Hassan Aurag at h_aurag yahoo com wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot. I could compile it, but prefer rpms anytime. Easier to
> > track dependencies and such. The usual hype in other words ;)
> >
> > Anyway, I agree with the other poster, adding Nautilus would be a great
> > idea.
>
> When we start doing Nautilus releases, we'll definitely be doing packages
> (RPMs), and not just source tarballs. But we haven't done our first Nautilus
> release yet.
>
>     -- Darin
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  evolution helixcode com
> http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution