Re: [Evolution] mail i18n issues

I find that having the date in an In-Reply-To is useful, for instance,
when someone replies to a very old message. (Having "On DATE, PERSON
wrote" before the quoted part of the reply serves the same purpose.)

The date is probably somewhat more international, anyway.

Leniently parsing messages from old software is one thing, but on no
account should new software put anything in an In-Reply-To field that
contains anything other than <>-enclosed message IDs.

Hmm, not even comments like any other structured header field?

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]