Re: [Evolution-hackers] Switching from Autotools to CMake for core evolution products

[Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>]

It would be nice to have gobject-introspection ship a cmake module as well.

I've already had to fix libical and evolution-data-server in
Continuous because of a mismatch between Makefile.introspection and
cmake.

Additionally, if somebody well versed in cmake could help out with
this issue, it would be great:

  https://github.com/libical/libical/pull/246

Ciao,
 Emmanuele.

On 27 October 2016 at 18:10, Sam Thursfield <ssssam gmail com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:23 PM, 藍挺瑋 <lantw44 gmail com> wrote:
> > 於 週三，2016-10-05 於 09:33 +0200，Milan Crha 提到：
> > Can we have a common way to enable GTK-Doc installation in modules
> > using CMake? In modules using Autotools, we have --enable-gtk-doc which
> > is recognized by every module supporting generating documentation with
> > GTK-Doc . However, we have two important modules using CMake,
> > Evolution (including Evolution-Data-Server) and WebKitGTK+, but they
> > require different options to enable GTK-Doc.
>
> gtk-doc now ships a CMake module upstream:
> <https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk-doc/tree/cmake>.
>
> I adapted this from existing code in the Firtree project:
> <https://github.com/rjw57/firtree/tree/master/cmake/Modules>
>
> It would be nice if Evo and WebKitGTK+ could switch to using that. It
> may need some improvements; I used it successfully in a couple of
> projects (proprietary ones, sadly) but I don't know how much use it
> has had elsewhere.
>
> Sam
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list



-- 
https://www.bassi.io
[@] ebassi [@gmail.com]