Re: [Evolution-hackers] Junk filtering controls and logic are confusing

[Michael Ekstrand <michael elehack net>]

On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 15:44 -0600, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
> > > In particular, a few things I am immediately interested in making
> > > happen:
> > >      1. Making address book checks preempt spam header checks
> > >      2. (maybe) figuring out why the spam header check isn't doing
> > >         anything
> > >      3. Making spam header & address book checks work without a spam
> > >         filtering plugin
> > >      4. Making spam filtering UI disable things to show how it works
> >
> > Sounds great to me!
>
> I've cooked up a pair of not-yet-tested patches that address (1) by
> moving the address book check before the header check and (3) by moving
> the 'do we have a junk filter?' test to right before the junk filter is
> actually moved.
>
> So far I'm thinking about in terms of minimal changes to make things
> work better.  I'm open to considering more invasive changes, but I need
> to understand the Evolution/Camel interface better, and don't have a
> huge amount of free time right now.  Enough to scratch a few itches,
> though :).

Just an update, I haven't forgotten about this.  Right now my jhbuild is
a bit broken ('build' fails on WebKit, and has for the last ~2 weeks)
and there is a lot going on.

- Michael

-- 
Michael Ekstrand — http://elehack.net/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part