Re: [Evolution-hackers] Subclassable and extendable IMAPX
- From: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>
- To: hilberg kernelconcepts de
- Cc: evolution-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Subclassable and extendable IMAPX
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 13:04:45 -0400
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:38 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> camel-imapx-tokens.txt is the file which is fed to gperf, and the
> resulting structs are used by the IMAPX tokenizer.
> The tokenizer is called inside imapx_untagged, and its result is
> switch()ed on, and the extended untagged handler function, which can
> be registered, is called in the default: block of that same switch
> statement.
At this point I would advocate ditching gperf and just building an
internal hash table of known tokens which subclasses can extend. The
tokens could be internalized with g_intern_string() to save a few string
comparisons, but I can't imagine that's a huge performance hit in the
face of network I/O.
I haven't really looked closely as how gperf is used within the parser,
so this is admittedly hand-wavy. But clearly a static hash function
built from a text file is not going to be extensible the way we need.
Matthew Barnes
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]