Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH 1/2] e_cal_new_system_foo() should create corresponding source in GConf

[Patrick Ohly <patrick ohly gmx de>]

On Di, 2011-05-10 at 09:34 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 10:19 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > It seems that a similar problem exists in libebook if no address books
> > were created already by Evolution. Chris is seeing such an issue with
> > 2.32.3 in MeeGo.
> 
> Oh, tits. I hate the fact that all this code is so *gratuitously*
> separate.

Yeah, me too. 3.2 will be better, but will still have separate
libebook/libecal libraries.

> > We probably need to add the "create GConf entry for local:system" part
> > to libebook in the gnome-2-32 branch. Is that something that is still
> > of interest for Trunk, given that EClient API will obsolete it for
> > 3.2?
> 
> It's still relevant for now, so let's do it. We *could* make a case for
> not bothering, and just fixing it in 3.0 and 2.32 instead. But our
> policy is to backport only fixes from master, and I prefer not to set a
> counter-precedent unless I absolutely have to. It doesn't *hurt* to fix
> it in master first.
> 
> Do you have a patch?

Sorry, no. And no time either :-/

-- 
Bye, Patrick Ohly
--  
Patrick Ohly gmx de
http://www.estamos.de/