Re: [Evolution-hackers] Rethinking account management

[Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com>]

On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 16:54 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> The new names are (with both versions at '0'):
> 
>    Bus Name:    org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.AddressBook0
>    Object Path: org/gnome/evolution/dataserver/AddressBookFactory
>    Interface:   org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.AddressbookFactory
> 
>    Bus Name:    org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.Calendar0
>    Object Path: org/gnome/evolution/dataserver/CalendarFactory
>    Interface:   org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.CalendarFactory 

	Hi,
thanks for doing this. I'm only wondering, why not a dot or dash (if
available for bus names) between the version number and the bus name
itself? Was there anything preventing it to do it that way? (I'm not
much familiar with DBus itself, so please forgive me if this is a lame
question.)
	Bye,
	Milan