Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH][RFC] Deal with negative intervals



On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 10:22 +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> [...]
> My only quibble is that any program should report on a client that
> creates bogus data, so I should like to see some kind of warning message
> written in the logs at this point.

 Good point. The patch I've just pushed uses g_warning() to say what
rule caused the error (as I don't think we can get any other
information).

   cmn
-- 
Carlos Martín Nieto        http://www.cmartin.tk

"¿Cómo voy a decir bobadas si soy mudo?" -- CACHAI

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]