Re: [Evolution-hackers] PATCH: Storing and fetching bodystructure, the patch

[Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>]

Ping, do we have a decision on this?

On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:57 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> I would like Evolution to store IMAP's bodystructure as often as
> possible. The reason for this is storing RDF graphs. Let me explain.
> 
> I wrote a EPlugin for Evolution that is compiled and distributed by the
> Tracker project. This plugin fetches as much metadata about E-mails as
> possible and pushes it into Tracker's RDF store.
> 
> Tracker's RDF store is a Nepomuk-ontology based RDF store that offers
> SPARQL as query language, and SPARQL Update as storage language.
> 
> We have enhanced the Nepomuk message ontology so that it can store the
> entire structure of an E-mail. This means the structure that you can
> request using the BODY or BODYSTRUCTURE FETCH requests. These return you
> the MIME structure of the message in a pre-parsed skiplist format.
> 
> Using this info our plugin can reconstruct the message's skeleton, but
> then in RDF as a graph.
> 
> I don't just talk. I wrote the patch to do this too. It's attached.
> 
> I tried to keep the changes small, and I implemented the migration code
> so that the tables' schemas will automatically be converted. The patch
> needs a good review, though. And testing.
> 
> This is the point of the patch (a stored bodystructure string):
> 
> sqlite> select bodystructure from 'INBOX/100' LIMIT 2;
> ("TEXT" "PLAIN" ("CHARSET" "ISO-8859-1") NIL NIL "8BIT" 2304 53 NIL NIL NIL NIL)
> ("TEXT" "PLAIN" NIL NIL NIL "7BIT" 3829 80 NIL NIL NIL NIL)
> sqlite> 
> 
> Note about adding BODYSTRUCTURE to the IMAP FETCH query that IMAP
> servers usually cache the body-structures. It wont slowdown an IMAP
> server, one that is worth being called "an IMAP server", much.
> 
> It will add some bandwidth. But apparently isn't Evolution trying to
> save bandwidth, otherwise camel-imap-folder.c would use ENVELOPE instead
> of BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS(-a long list-)] (right?).
> 
> 
> Here are some pointers about things I just wrote:
> 
> The Nemomuk message ontology
> http://git.gnome.org/cgit/tracker/tree/data/ontologies/34-nmo.ontology
> 
> How we want this stuff in Tracker, how it could be used
> http://live.gnome.org/Tracker/Documentation/EmailSparql
> 
> The Evolution plugin:
> http://git.gnome.org/cgit/tracker/tree/src/plugins/evolution/tracker-evolution-plugin.c
> 
> 
> Let me know!
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-hackers mailing list
> Evolution-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
-- 
Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be 
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org 
http://pvanhoof.be/blog
http://codeminded.be