Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution-hackers Digest, Vol 49, Issue 8

[Saint yeyo <st yeyo gmail com>]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:00 PM, <evolution-hackers-request gnome org> wrote:

Send Evolution-hackers mailing list submissions to
       evolution-hackers gnome org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
       http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
       evolution-hackers-request gnome org

You can reach the person managing the list at
       evolution-hackers-owner gnome org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Evolution-hackers digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1.  Evolution branched for GNOME 2.28 (Chenthill)
  2. Re:  Evolution branched for GNOME 2.28 (Thomas Mittelstaedt)
  3. Re:  Evolution branched for GNOME 2.28 (Bharath Acharya)
  4.  how to initialize bf->priv->file_db (Saint yeyo)
  5. Re:  go-evolution.org (Gilles Dartiguelongue)
  6. Re:  how to initialize bf->priv->file_db (Milan Crha)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:20:38 +0530
From: Chenthill <pchenthill novell com>
Subject: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution branched for GNOME 2.28
To: evolution-hackers gnome org, gnome-i18n gnome org,
       desktop-devel-list gnome org, gnome-doc-list gnome org,
       release-team gnome org
Message-ID: <1250002238 25155 741 camel linux-adcj>
Content-Type: text/plain

Hi,
 We have made a early branching for evolution for GNOME 2.28. We have
been discussing on this in the past and to have the context, please go
through the following threads,

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2009-August/msg00008.html
and
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-June/msg00018.html

The following modules have been branched,
gtkhtml, evolution-data-server, evolution and evolution-exchange. The
branch is gnome-2-28.

Only critical fixes will be made for evolution-2.28. By critical fixes,
I mean blockers and important bugs identified as must-fix by module
maintainers. All freezes would apply for gnome-2-28 branch. Please note
that these patches needs to be committed to master and gnome-2-28
branch.

The kill-bonobo-branch and eds-dbus-port will be merged into master. So
it means master will not have any freezes. Most of the active work will
be going on master branch to get it usable for evolution 2.29.1.

Once the branches are merged to trunk, we would be replying back to this
thread mentioning the same.

We have made a rough road-map for Evolution 3.0 -
http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo3.0  which will be discussed and modified
further.

We will also be discussing over some pending tasks from Evolution 2.28
and include the ones which are possible for
http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.28 .


Thanks, Chenthill.


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 04:03:08 +0200
From: Thomas Mittelstaedt <tmstaedt t-mittelstaedt de>
Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution branched for GNOME 2.28
To: Chenthill <pchenthill novell com>
Cc: evolution-hackers gnome org
Message-ID: <1250042588 4426 1 camel linux1>
Content-Type: text/plain

git branch -r does not list gnome-2-28 for the evolution project, and a
merge failed, of course. For evolution-data-server and gtkhtml, it
worked.

Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2009, 20:20 +0530 schrieb Chenthill:
> Hi,
>   We have made a early branching for evolution for GNOME 2.28. We have
> been discussing on this in the past and to have the context, please go
> through the following threads,
>
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2009-August/msg00008.html
> and
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-June/msg00018.html
>
> The following modules have been branched,
> gtkhtml, evolution-data-server, evolution and evolution-exchange. The
> branch is gnome-2-28.
>
> Only critical fixes will be made for evolution-2.28. By critical fixes,
> I mean blockers and important bugs identified as must-fix by module
> maintainers. All freezes would apply for gnome-2-28 branch. Please note
> that these patches needs to be committed to master and gnome-2-28
> branch.
>
> The kill-bonobo-branch and eds-dbus-port will be merged into master. So
> it means master will not have any freezes. Most of the active work will
> be going on master branch to get it usable for evolution 2.29.1.
>
> Once the branches are merged to trunk, we would be replying back to this
> thread mentioning the same.
>
> We have made a rough road-map for Evolution 3.0 -
> http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo3.0  which will be discussed and modified
> further.
>
> We will also be discussing over some pending tasks from Evolution 2.28
> and include the ones which are possible for
> http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.28 .
>
>
> Thanks, Chenthill.
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-hackers mailing list
> Evolution-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers




------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:32:34 +0530
From: Bharath Acharya <abharath novell com>
Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution branched for GNOME 2.28
To: tmstaedt t-mittelstaedt de
Cc: evolution-hackers gnome org
Message-ID: <1250064154 18684 1 camel abharath-OS11-1 site>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 04:03 +0200, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote:
> git branch -r does not list gnome-2-28 for the evolution project, and a
> merge failed, of course. For evolution-data-server and gtkhtml, it
> worked.

I see it branched for evolution too.
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/evolution/log/?h=gnome-2-28

I also see a commit for the branch :)

Regards,
--Bharath


>
> Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2009, 20:20 +0530 schrieb Chenthill:
> > Hi,
> >   We have made a early branching for evolution for GNOME 2.28. We have
> > been discussing on this in the past and to have the context, please go
> > through the following threads,
> >
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2009-August/msg00008.html
> > and
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-June/msg00018.html
> >
> > The following modules have been branched,
> > gtkhtml, evolution-data-server, evolution and evolution-exchange. The
> > branch is gnome-2-28.
> >
> > Only critical fixes will be made for evolution-2.28. By critical fixes,
> > I mean blockers and important bugs identified as must-fix by module
> > maintainers. All freezes would apply for gnome-2-28 branch. Please note
> > that these patches needs to be committed to master and gnome-2-28
> > branch.
> >
> > The kill-bonobo-branch and eds-dbus-port will be merged into master. So
> > it means master will not have any freezes. Most of the active work will
> > be going on master branch to get it usable for evolution 2.29.1.
> >
> > Once the branches are merged to trunk, we would be replying back to this
> > thread mentioning the same.
> >
> > We have made a rough road-map for Evolution 3.0 -
> > http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo3.0  which will be discussed and modified
> > further.
> >
> > We will also be discussing over some pending tasks from Evolution 2.28
> > and include the ones which are possible for
> > http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.28 .
> >
> >
> > Thanks, Chenthill.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Evolution-hackers mailing list
> > Evolution-hackers gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-hackers mailing list
> Evolution-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers




------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:17:59 +0800
From: Saint yeyo <st yeyo gmail com>
Subject: [Evolution-hackers] how to initialize bf->priv->file_db
To: evolution-hackers gnome org
Message-ID:
       <5eb191c00908120217s7906140eoe702bc1ba5aea48 mail gmail com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

hello,

how to initialize 'bf->priv->file_db'? because db = bf->priv->file_db, but
with NULL value always segmentation fault return,  I tried bf->priv->file_db
= malloc(sizeof(DB)); but error said incomplete type, how can I do?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/attachments/20090812/a76bfab3/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:03:50 +0200
From: Gilles Dartiguelongue <gilles dartiguelongue esiee org>
Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] go-evolution.org
To: Nirav Kumar <knirav novell com>
Cc: P Chenthill <PChenthill novell com>, evolution-hackers gnome org
Message-ID: <1250071430 25532 2 camel dhcp-16 lan rep sj>
Content-Type: text/plain

can we get the new user lockdown now at least ?

--
Gilles Dartiguelongue <gilles dartiguelongue esiee org>



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:56:30 +0200
From: Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com>
Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] how to initialize bf->priv->file_db
To: evolution-hackers gnome org
Message-ID: <1250074590 4946 1 camel localhost localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 17:17 +0800, Saint yeyo wrote:
> hello,
>
> how to initialize 'bf->priv->file_db'? because db = bf->priv->file_db,
> but with NULL value always segmentation fault return,  I tried
> bf->priv->file_db = malloc(sizeof(DB)); but error said incomplete
> type, how can I do?

       Hi,
maybe I will sound silly, but what type a bf is? What is its parent
object? You know, you just give here some _expression_ from somewhere.
The context is missing, at least for me.
       Bye,
       Milan



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


End of Evolution-hackers Digest, Vol 49, Issue 8
************************************************

>       Hi,
>maybe I will sound silly, but what type a bf is? What is its parent
>object? You know, you just give here some _expression_ from somewhere.
>The context is missing, at least for me.
>       Bye,
>       Milan
 

sorry,

the data struct is like following:

EBookBackend *backend;

EBookBackendFile *bf = E_BOOK_BACKEND_FILE (backend);

DB             *db = bf->priv->file_db; // here occurence segmentation fault

then  I tried 

backend = malloc(sizeof(EBookBackend));
backend->priv = malloc(sizeof(ebookbackendvcfprivate));
backend->priv->file_db = malloc(sizeof(DB));

it's better, but still can't access the address of file_db, how can I do, 

than you.