Re: [Evolution-hackers] Getting rid of shipped libdb
- From: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>
- To: evolution-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Getting rid of shipped libdb
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:51:26 -0400
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 22:15 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> IIRC, I had replied to Ross on a similar query, start GNOME 2.24. Still
> OpenSUSE ships with in-built libdb. I'm not aware of any other distro.
>
> JPR, who use to maintain Evolution few years back, gave me the notes on
> why it was decided to go this way (forking libdb). So if we have answers
> for all those points, I'm fine for that. We don't want to break anything
> thatz fine otherwise. I'm not tracking libdb at all, if you have the
> answers, then lets recalculate and plan for it in 2.26.
Just as a data point, E-D-S on Fedora links to the system libdb.
My understanding is it wasn't so much a fork as a freeze, since I guess
libdb has had trouble maintaining ABI or API stability in the past. I
don't think any significant changes have been made to our bundled libdb
other than build-related and maybe security-related stuff.
I guess the real question is whether libdb is stable these days. I
don't recall any issues with it over the past year since switching over
to the system library. Would be great to drop both it and our bundled
libical for 2.26.
Matt
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]