Am Mittwoch, den 05.03.2008, 13:17 -0500 schrieb Matthew Barnes: > On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 10:59 +0100, Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote: > > I'm not sure about which solution is best, and probably the "%x" > > solution is easier and will do the right job. If that's the case, I can > > try to change the sources so strftime uses "%x" and not hardcoded > > combinations of "%d" and "%m". > > Using "%x" and "%X" sounds like the right way. Please do, and submit > your patches to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ for review. ..or attach them to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336253 which should be the corresponding bug report to this issue. andre -- mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil