Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution doesn't honor LC_TIME (and other LC_ variables)

Am Mittwoch, den 05.03.2008, 13:17 -0500 schrieb Matthew Barnes:
> On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 10:59 +0100, Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
> > I'm not sure about which solution is best, and probably the "%x"
> > solution is easier and will do the right job. If that's the case, I can
> > try to change the sources so strftime uses "%x" and not hardcoded
> > combinations of "%d" and "%m".
> Using "%x" and "%X" sounds like the right way.  Please do, and submit
> your patches to for review.

..or attach them to
which should be the corresponding bug report to this issue.

 mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]