Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution doesn't honor LC_TIME (and other LC_ variables)

Hi Matthew :)

On mié, 2008-03-05 at 13:17 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 10:59 +0100, Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
> > I'm not sure about which solution is best, and probably the "%x"
> > solution is easier and will do the right job. If that's the case, I can
> > try to change the sources so strftime uses "%x" and not hardcoded
> > combinations of "%d" and "%m".
> Using "%x" and "%X" sounds like the right way.  Please do, and submit
> your patches to for review.

Since I'm not familiar with the po files (I don't know if I can modify
them directly or not) and so the work may take some time, agains which
version should I make my patches? Latest stable? Latest devel? Latest
SVN? Any preference?

BTW, I have to set up an accout at the gnome bugzilla...

I'll try to have some patch by tomorrow evening.

Raúl "DervishD" Núñez de Arenas Coronado
Linux Registered User 88736 |
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen!
We are waiting for 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 +0000 ...

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]