Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Evolution] Beagle and Tracker, letting Evolution feed those beasts RDF triples instead
- From: Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>
- To: michael meeks novell com
- Cc: Evolution Hackers <evolution-hackers gnome org>, Tracker mailing list <tracker-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Evolution] Beagle and Tracker, letting Evolution feed those beasts RDF triples instead
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:08:59 +0100
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 16:37 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
[CUT]
> So there is at least some bound to the growth of the deleted UUID
> log ;-) which is the size / likelyhood of re-use in the UUID space.
>
> It's hard to think of solutions that are that satisfying; but - perhaps
> something like cropping the deletion log-size at a percentage of stored
> mail size, with some "log overflow" type message to flag that; or having
> some arbitrary size bound on it, or more carefully disabling logging
> when search services are disabled, or ... having only a single client,
> or warning the user that they should run their search service some more,
> or perhaps even coupling the indexing piece more closely to the mailer
> itself somehow.
After some discussion on IRC we decided to add a "Cleanup" method to the
registrar's interface. This method will be called whenever Evolution has
a reason to believe that the `last_checkout` date as passed during the
registry of the registrar has become (or is) too old.
After the Cleanup Evolution will do a re-import using mostly SetMany.
I have updated http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/Metadata for this.
--
Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
http://pvanhoof.be/blog
http://codeminded.be
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]