Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo svn head requires libgtkhtml-3.14 >= 3.16.0' but gtkhtml svn head is Version: 3.15.92
- From: Jules Colding <colding omesc com>
- To: Srinivasa Ragavan <sragavan novell com>
- Cc: evolution-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo svn head requires libgtkhtml-3.14 >= 3.16.0' but gtkhtml svn head is Version: 3.15.92
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:33:51 +0200
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:07 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:34 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > > > This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot
> > > > release. Anyways is fine IMO.
> > >
> > > Hi Srini,
> > >
> > > I think we still have a misunderstanding here. The latest revision of
> > > Subversion trunk still has the version in configure.in at 3.15.92 and
> > > the latest ChangeLog entry is:
> > >
> > > 2007-09-03 Srinivasa Ragavan <sragavan novell com>
> > >
> > > ** GtkHTML 3.15.92 release
> > >
> > > * NEWS, configure.in:
> > >
> > > But the latest ChangeLog entry in the 3.16.0 tarball is:
> > >
> > > 2007-09-17 Srinivasa Ragavan <sragavan novell com>
> > >
> > > ** GtkHTML 3.16.0 release
> > >
> > > * NEWS:
> > > * configure.in:
> > >
> > > So it looks like at least the ChangeLog, NEWS, and configure.in changes
> > > prior to the 3.16.0 tarball upload were never committed.
> >
> > Which, BTW, is still the case for evolution (version 2.11.92 in svn) and
> > e-d-s (version 1.11.92 in svn). The changes up to and including x.12.0
> > must still be on someones disk.
>
> It is there in gnome-2-20 branch as well. It isn't there in trunk.
So the gnome-2-20 branch is further along than trunk?
--
jules
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]