Re: [Evolution-hackers] SVN issues
- From: Srinivasa Ragavan <sragavan novell com>
- To: Jules Colding <colding omesc com>
- Cc: Evolution Hackers <Evolution-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] SVN issues
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:36:42 +0530
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 09:18 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 15:43 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Hi all;
> >
> > I'm not an evolution developer but I'm trying to understand the way the
> > project uses subversion. I have some questions, especially now that
> > there's been a release of 2.12:
> >
> > * Shouldn't there be a gnome-2-20 branch on evolution-webcal?
> > there may be other Evo modules that don't have the right branch.
evolution-webcal module isn't maintained by the Evolution team. I think
Rodney (dobey) maintains it.
> > * I notice that the versions of the code that I'm building still
> > say 2.11.92, rather than 2.12, but I thought that 2.12 was
> > officially released? I don't see anything on the gnome-2-20
> > branch that changes the version number, which is where you'd
> > expect it to be.
Blame it on me. We do have a gnome-2-20 branch and I normally do the
tagging and commit of configure, NEWS, ChangeLogs on Wednesday's (Day of
release). Unfortunately I'm sick for the past three days and I haven't
had a touch of my laptop apart from any emergency emails/issues. Just
today I have done it. Sorry for any inconvenience.
> > * Are we adding tags to the code to denote the release? I don't
> > see any tags that seem to be related to this release.
>
Yes. We are tagging releases and it is done for 2.12.0 as well.
> I can only join you in your puzzlement. The following are excepts from
> configure.in and shell/Makefile.am:
>
> configure.in:
> AC_INIT(evolution, 2.11.92, http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Evolution)
>
>
> shell/Makefile.am:
> noinst_PROGRAMS = evolution
>
> install-exec-local: install-evolution
> $(mkinstalldirs) $(DESTDIR)$(libexecdir)
> mv $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/evolution-$(BASE_VERSION) $(DESTDIR)$(libexecdir)/evolution-$(BASE_VERSION)
> $(INSTALL_PROGRAM) evolution-nognome $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/evolution-$(BASE_VERSION)
>
>
> These tree excerpts alone makes me believe that
> "svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution/trunk" isn't the primary repository that
> the Novell developers checks their source into...
Jules, No we work ONLY with svn.gnome.org and whatever we do are with
GNOME SVN only. You may see some small-random patches with OpenSUSE but
otherwise there is nothing else hidden here.
-Srini.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]