Re: [Evolution-hackers] SVN issues

[Jules Colding <colding omesc com>]

On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 13:10 +0530, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 09:18 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 15:43 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > > Hi all;
> > > 
> > > I'm not an evolution developer but I'm trying to understand the way the
> > > project uses subversion.  I have some questions, especially now that
> > > there's been a release of 2.12:
> > > 
> > >       * Shouldn't there be a gnome-2-20 branch on evolution-webcal?
> > >         there may be other Evo modules that don't have the right branch.
> > >       * I notice that the versions of the code that I'm building still
> > >         say 2.11.92, rather than 2.12, but I thought that 2.12 was
> > >         officially released?  I don't see anything on the gnome-2-20
> > >         branch that changes the version number, which is where you'd
> > >         expect it to be.
> > >       * Are we adding tags to the code to denote the release?  I don't
> > >         see any tags that seem to be related to this release.
> > 
> > I can only join you in your puzzlement. The following are excepts from
> > configure.in and shell/Makefile.am:
> > 
> > configure.in:
> > 	AC_INIT(evolution, 2.11.92, http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Evolution)
> > 
> > 
> > shell/Makefile.am:
> > 	noinst_PROGRAMS = evolution
> > 
> > 	install-exec-local: install-evolution
> > 	        $(mkinstalldirs) $(DESTDIR)$(libexecdir)
> > 	        mv $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/evolution-$(BASE_VERSION) $(DESTDIR)$(libexecdir)/evolution-$(BASE_VERSION)
> > 	        $(INSTALL_PROGRAM) evolution-nognome $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/evolution-$(BASE_VERSION)
> > 
> > 
> > These tree excerpts alone makes me believe that
> > "svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution/trunk" isn't the primary repository that
> > the Novell developers checks their source into...
> > 
> Certain instances make us believe somethings to be true, but, they are
> necessarily not.  
> 
> > puzzled,
> 
> When kisses and misses happen, they leave us puzzled. ;-)

;-)


> Will be fixed shortly and thanks for bringing it out. 

Thanks,
  jules