Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removal of implementation details from public API, any breakages?

[Srinivasa Ragavan <sragavan novell com>]

Ross,

It will be great if you can mail the details on the address book stuff
as well. I would like the libebook clients like OOo, etc to comment on
this. 

-Srini.

On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 11:29 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Last week I committed a patch to libebook, and want to commit a patch to
> libecal[1], which removes private functions and types from the installed
> headers.  This has several consequences:
> 
> - e_cal_view_new() is removed
> - ECalListener is removed
> - ECalViewListener is removed
> 
> I believe that nobody is using these functions apart from libecal
> itself, so this removal is safe.  However, I'd appreciate it if anyone
> writing advanced clients to EDS (like Zimbra or Brutas) remove their
> currently installed headers, apply the patch, and rebuild.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ross
> 
> [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438727
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-hackers mailing list
> Evolution-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers