Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions
- From: Ross Boylan <ross biostat ucsf edu>
- To: evolution-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 00:12:04 -0700
On Thursday 31 May 2007 16:09, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 17:18 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > > Single namespace. It's all INBOX.folder.subfolder.
> > > The one wrinkle is that in some cases 'folder' exists in the namespace,
> > > but is not an actual box or folder (whatever the right term is) on the
> > > server: INBOX.folder.subfolder is a real folder; INBOX.folder is not.
> >
> > I guess just a bug
>
> I don't have a build environment anymore so I can't easily test this
> patch, but perhaps i will fix your missing folder troubles.
>
I'm not sure that the names that aren't folders problem is causing any of the
problems I'm seeing. While such names don't appear in the folder list on the
left pane, I also have plenty of ordinary folders that aren't appearing. And
the "ghost" folders, along with their children, do show up in the Folder|
subscription dialogue.
evolution seems to insist on showing only subscribed folders, even when I
disable the "show only subscribed folders option."
Since the ghost folders aren't folders, there is no way I can subscribe to
them. So if I wanted to see only subscribed folders, that might create a
problem.
I was able to start up evo under the debugger on the system that's having
problems, and this time it worked. Yay!
I put future breakpoints on camel_store_supports_subscriptions, and (following
the location of the patches you provided) imap4_build_folder_info. I also
put one on imap_build_folder_info (a wild guess).
Unfortunately none of these were hit when evo started up and was deciding what
to show. I did hit the camel_store_support_subscriptions when I opened the
Folders | subscriptions dialogue.
I tried creating an "IMAP" type account. This did hit imap_build_folder_info,
and it did show all my folders (including ghosts). Performance seems pretty
good.
I'm going to stop for now, while I'm ahead.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]