Re: [Evolution-hackers] Where to put UI items for templates (Bug #127529)
- From: Harish Krishnaswamy <kharish novell com>
- To: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
- Cc: evolution-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Where to put UI items for templates (Bug #127529)
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:16:59 +0530
Hi Andre,
Thank you for your concern - but I believe I *did* give Matthew some
feedback on the patch over IRC (see Chat transcript [1] below) a couple
of weeks ago - about a possible ABI violation and a possible way to
avoid it and he had agreed to rework that bit.
We do love those who love to hack on Evo :-).
Cheers,
Harish
[1] Log - #evolution - 29 Jan 2007
(20:19:07) xfceslacker: harish is there something wrong with the email I
sent?(http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2007-January/msg00053.html)
(20:20:23) harish: xfceslacker: none
(20:21:42) xfceslacker: I waited nearly a month for a response on my
last email.
(http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2007-January/msg00000.html)
(20:22:05) harish: except that on a very quick glance at the patch - I
feel that inserting a new element into an enum set violates the ABI
(20:22:25) xfceslacker: ok
(20:22:30) xfceslacker: thanks
(20:22:31) xfceslacker: :)
(20:23:16) harish: xfceslacker: I do not primarily hack on the mailer
component - I have poked those who do to have a look at it and provide a
response
<snip>
(20:23:46) harish: xfceslacker: sorry - the team is swamped by quite a
bit of work..thanks for your patience
(20:23:53) xfceslacker: ok.
(20:24:01) xfceslacker: Anything else you see wrong with the patch?
(20:25:36) xfceslacker: I know my em_utils_load_template function is
ugly.
(20:25:42) harish: xfceslacker: I am not the best person to make the
call - but I'd prefer if you could append the new value so it extends
the current set.
(20:26:00) xfceslacker: ok
(20:27:06) xfceslacker: You're talking about _mail_component_folder_t
right?
(20:27:35) xfceslacker: or enum {
(20:27:35) xfceslacker: SEND,
(20:27:35) xfceslacker: SAVE_DRAFT,
(20:27:35) xfceslacker: + SAVE_TEMPLATE,
(20:27:35) xfceslacker: LAST_SIGNAL
(20:27:35) xfceslacker: };
(20:29:04) xfceslacker: or both?
(20:30:19) harish: _e_account_item_t on libedataserver
(20:30:27) xfceslacker: oh
(20:30:29) xfceslacker: sorry
(20:31:14) harish: Evolution is not a devel library...EDS is more
religious about changes
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 02:30 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> may a developer answer this, or shall matthew ask for a third time on
> this list, after waiting for six weeks for some feedback?
>
> andre
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]