Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel.Store or Camel.Folder sync()

[Jules Colding <colding omesc com>]

On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 13:35 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 08:51 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> 
> > Yes sure, but my question was more directed towards the expunge
> > functionality of sync(). Both camel_store_sync() and camel_folder_sync()
> > have an option for expunging folders. The functionality is therefore
> > shared between the Camel.Store and Camel.Folder classes.
> > 
> > I am therefore in doubt about which one is the preferred place to
> > actually implement the expunge functionality. 
> The store_sync() calls a folder_sync on all the folders available in the
> store. So you actually need to implement it the Camel.Folder sync. And
> the store sync would do the rest for you. It is not necessary for you to
> implement the store_sync method unless you drastically want to change
> something specific to your store, which i doubt. For more details just
> see store_sync() function in camel-store.c. 
> 
> > 
> > I would guess in Camel.Folder but is that correct?
> yup.

OK - thanks a lot,
  jules