Re: [Evolution-hackers] inline gpg support bounty



On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:23 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 10:47 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 00:54 +1300, Matt Brown wrote:
> > > 2) Required Support
> > > The bounty lists the require functionality as "support of inline-pgp"
> > > emails, with an extension of allowing them to be sent. 
> > > 
> > > Given that there seems to be widespread agreement that inline pgp is
> > > broken fairly fundamentally, would a patch that only implemented
> > > decryption / viewing support of received messages be acceptable?
> > 
> > I would personally be happy with that, but I'm not sure if just that
> > much would qualify for the bounty or not (jpr?)
> > 
> > certainly rendering received inline-pgp messages is by far the more
> > important of the 2.
> 
> I agree, it is more important.  I think if this was done well, we could
> separate the two items out (sending and receiving) and pay the same
> bounty for both.

sounds good to me

> 
> -JP
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.novell.com

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]