On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:23 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 10:47 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 00:54 +1300, Matt Brown wrote: > > > 2) Required Support > > > The bounty lists the require functionality as "support of inline-pgp" > > > emails, with an extension of allowing them to be sent. > > > > > > Given that there seems to be widespread agreement that inline pgp is > > > broken fairly fundamentally, would a patch that only implemented > > > decryption / viewing support of received messages be acceptable? > > > > I would personally be happy with that, but I'm not sure if just that > > much would qualify for the bounty or not (jpr?) > > > > certainly rendering received inline-pgp messages is by far the more > > important of the 2. > > I agree, it is more important. I think if this was done well, we could > separate the two items out (sending and receiving) and pay the same > bounty for both. sounds good to me > > -JP -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. fejj ximian com - www.novell.com
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature