Re: [Evolution-hackers] spamd control?

[William John Murray <w murray rl ac uk>]

   Yes!
    That did the trick. I'll advertise it back on Fedora lists, but it
has got my spamd down, and with my 256Mb it makes a real difference.

  Thanks very much,
           Bill

On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 17:17 +0000, Radek Doulík wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:59 +0000, William John Murray wrote: 
> > On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:28 +0000, Radek Doulík wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 12:55 +0000, William John Murray wrote: 
> > > >    Hello there,
> > > >                I would like to save memory, while still running
> > > > spamassassin, (5 copies is 75Mb real Ram taken, quite a chunk for 1
> > > > process)from evolution. I cannot figure out how this is controlled.
> > > > /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin is ignored.
> > > I don't know what distribution do you use, but in suse 9.2 I have
> > > 
> > > SPAMD_ARGS="-d -c -L -m 1"
> > > 
> > > in /etc/sysconfig/spamd. (I've added -m 1 to reduce children of spamd
> > > to 1)
> > > 
> > > Cheers
> > > Radek
> > 
> >  Hi Radek,
> >    Thanks .Fedora has /etc/sysconfig/spamassasin which probably does a
> > similar job? It has only 1 line:
> > SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -c -m2 -H"
> >   
> >    The -H seems a bit weird; as the man page says that means the next
> > arg. is the home directory. But I'll add the '-L' which makes for local
> > that Rodney thought might be relevant.
> Yeah, you will need -L in case you have network tests disabled in evo
> preferences (which is the default).
> 
> For -H the man page says: "By specifying no argument, spamd will use
> the spamc caller's home directory instead."
> 
> R.
> 
> >      Bill
> > 
> -- 
> Radek Doulík <rodo novell com>
> Novell, Inc.