Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-groupwise-maintainers
- From: chen <pchenthill novell com>
- To: Harish Krishnaswamy <kharish novell com>
- Cc: ls skeptopotamus ximian com, JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>, Evolution Hackers mailing list <evolution-hackers lists ximian com>, evolution-groupwise-maintainers ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-groupwise-maintainers
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:46:23 +0530
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 14:01 +0000, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 23:22 +0530, Sivaiah Nallagatla wrote:
> >On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 12:02 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> >> I got this alias setup for bugzilla in case we want to assign groupwise
> >> related bugs there some how.
> >>
> >> Personally I'd prefer to keep the groupwise bugs assigned to individual
> >> components with the groupwise keyword rather than create a separate
> >> product (the GroupWise product in their now was a broken attempt at
> >> tracking some server issues) or separate component. We don't put IMAP
> >> or POP bugs in a separate component. However it is a little different
> >> in this case because we have a specific group working on these bugs and
> >> there are currently a lot of them. We could transfer the groupwise
> >> keyword bugs that aren't assigned specifically right now to
> >> evolution-groupwise-maintainers and periodically make sure the
> >> assignment is right. This would cut down the bug traffic to
> >> evolution-mail-maintainers, evolution-calendar-maintainers, etc.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >This idea looks good to me though i would prefer separte product. I feel having separate
> >product would make bug submitting easier for folks who are testing/using
> >groupwise and avoids even the initial mails sent when new bug is filed.
> >Going over bugzilla to find groupwise related bugs will be more painful
> >than moving an occasional non-groupwise bug present in groupwise prodcut
> >to evolution.
> >
> >
> >Siva
> >
>
> I welcome this idea - actually helps us ensure that none of the bugs are
> missed. Currently, some of them have skipped my radar - since groupwise
> keyword was not mentioned in some cases and had been assigned to the
> product design team - forcing me to resort to look for bugs filed by the
> QA hackers rather than the other way round.
>
> Also, it should reduce lots of traffic for non-gw maintainers - yes.
>
> Harish
>
> ______
The idea looks good. It would be better to have the bugs filed under
groupwise component for the same reasons mentioned above.
thanks, chenthill.
> _________________________________________
> evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]