Re: [Evolution-hackers] Possible bug in GW Camel provider
- From: Parthasarathi Susarla <sparthasarathi novell com>
- To: Jules Colding <colding omesc com>
- Cc: Evolution Hackers <evolution-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Possible bug in GW Camel provider
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:58:50 +0530
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 14:29 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 21:30 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> > Hey jules,
> > On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 15:39 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > I have just inspected cvs HEAD instead of the gnome-2-12 branch. The
> > > strings are indeed being released in HEAD so my assertion that this is a
> > > bug seems to be correct, but the bug(s) is only present in the
> > > gnome-2-12 branch.
> > Yeah! a lot changes in the HEAD, did not put them on the stable branch
> > since they were way to many string changes and ABI breakages.
> > HEAD has a lot of fixes.
> Speaking about fixes... When mi is retrieved at line 1061 in
> camel-groupwise-folder.c (HEAD) the refcount is incremented. mi is never
> unreffed when exist is TRUE.
> I think that there should be a call the camel_message_info_free() at
> line 1167 just after the call to camel_folder_change_info_change_uid().
You are right. Fix is committed to head.
] [Thread Prev