Re: [Evolution-hackers] IMAP4REV1

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

Well, I don't have any stake in it remember.  I'm moving to hula.

The disksummary branch has a completely new imap implementation,
unrelated to either of those; i dont intend on working on anything else
after 2.4 is released.


On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 10:45 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> hey guys,
> 
>   Given that the two of you have a huge stake here - possibly to fix
> bugs in IMAP4REV1 (if you choose so) - could you please let your views
> on this known ?
> 
> Harish
> 
> On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 16:18 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> > We need to make a decision about imap4rev1.
> 
> > We can either
> >  Leave it there, maybe add a warning about how buggy it is.  We're well
> > beyond string freeze though.
> > 
> >  Leave it there, but hack the code in nasty ways so that you can't
> > create new accounts using it.  Its a messy nasty hack.
> > 
> >  Remove it from the build entirely, and then add new migration code to
> > switch it to the older 'imap' implementation, or some other equivalent
> > switch over mechanism.  The folder paths, foldernames, cache, summary
> > files, are all probably so different as to make this a lot of work.
> > 
> >  Do nothing, don't make a decision.
> > 
> > Anything other than removing it then needs another decision on whether
> > we fix any bugs in the code or not.
> > 
> 
-- 
adfa(evolution-2.4:20087): gtkhtml-WARNING **: cannot find icon:
'stock_insert-url' in gnome