On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 15:49 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 09:27 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > > > hrm, i sent this yesterday butit never showed up on the list. trying > > again. > > > > > > i'm going to start moving camel into eds soon (on a branch, after i > > merge the messageinfo stuff back). its too hard to do any other way, > > particularly since i want to use libdb to solve some problems and this > > is the only practical way for it to have access to it. > > > > this will also likely involve moving some e-util stuff into eds too. > > > > (i expect this plan to be vetoed before i do it, but it has to be > > brought up sooner rather than later). > > Does this mean simply moving the code into the e-d-s libraries, keeping > the camel provider threads running in the main evolution process? > > Or do you envisage moving the camel provider threads into the e-d-s > process, or perhaps better, into a new process? (e.g. camel-data-server) > Maybe even one process per provider? simply moving the library code into the eds package. Jeff > > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers lists ximian com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers > -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. fejj ximian com - www.novell.com
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature