Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel into eds
- From: David Malcolm <dmalcolm redhat com>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: Evolution Hackers <evolution-hackers lists ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel into eds
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:49:05 -0500
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 09:27 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
>
> hrm, i sent this yesterday butit never showed up on the list. trying
> again.
>
>
> i'm going to start moving camel into eds soon (on a branch, after i
> merge the messageinfo stuff back). its too hard to do any other way,
> particularly since i want to use libdb to solve some problems and this
> is the only practical way for it to have access to it.
>
> this will also likely involve moving some e-util stuff into eds too.
>
> (i expect this plan to be vetoed before i do it, but it has to be
> brought up sooner rather than later).
Does this mean simply moving the code into the e-d-s libraries, keeping
the camel provider threads running in the main evolution process?
Or do you envisage moving the camel provider threads into the e-d-s
process, or perhaps better, into a new process? (e.g. camel-data-server)
Maybe even one process per provider?
Dave
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]