Re: [Evolution-hackers] "Do you want Evo as def. mail?"
- From: smurfd <smurfd smurfnet homelinux net>
- To: evolution-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] "Do you want Evo as def. mail?"
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:09:05 +0100
Ah,okey. It sounded good in my head, before i read this, so now i totaly
agree..
And i take it,the feature has been taken care of?
As i said, ive seen alot of proposals, and nothing in the CVS yet.
tor 2004-02-26 klockan 16.45 skrev yeti@:
> I still think evolution should have a option in the settings that
> re-checks the default mailer setting. What if the user misakenly runs a
> different mailer that steals the default setting? TBH isnt the "Do not
> bother me again? Y/N" option redundant?
>
> The first time it is run, Evolution should ask to become the default
> mailer, regardless of what is in the GConf setting at the time (if
> the user is migrating from X to Evoltion).
>
> Then, it should assume that the user doesnt want to be asked again, even
> if the GConf setting changes (avoiding outlook-style fights to be
> default).
>
> BUT, it should still allow the user to manually set Evolution to be the
> default mailer, by going into the settings and clicking "Set Default
> Mailer". (I added this to one of the patches in Bugzilla)
>
> If youre forcing users to edit the GConf setting to get Evolution to
> automagically set a GConf key, whats the point? You might as well just
> let people just edit the GConf to begin with.
>
> And anyone know what problems this'll bring up with KDE? Does KDE do its
> own GConf-style thing? Will this have to be coded for too?
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]