Re: [Evolution-hackers] send/receive

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>]

On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 21:37 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 22:45 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> > > > My first thought is that could make this dialog completely unwieldy, i
> > > > personally already have 4 mail accounts plus an NNTP account, if I were
> > > > to add my groupwise calendar along with 3-4 web calendars, its now holds
> > > > about 10 items.
> > > > 
> > > I was talking on hooking it to the Send/Receive action, not specifically
> > > to the dialog, although it would make sense to show progress in that
> > > dialog for calendars also.
> > 
> > Not going to be terribly easy though, given the way it works, unless
> > you want to start using camel progress primitives in the calendar :-)
> 
> Perhaps its time to not make Send/Receive a global shell routine?
> Mailer can still use send/receive, addressbook may not need any and
> calendar can do "refresh" or something.
> 
I think this what makes more sense. Although I liked the idea of having
a single 'refresh' button for all components.
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>