Re: [Evolution-hackers] evo 2.0 versioning
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>
- Cc: mccann jhu edu, Evolution Hackers <evolution-hackers ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] evo 2.0 versioning
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:35:33 -0400
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 07:00 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hi JP,
>
> On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 02:34, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 10:22 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > So, the impending release of version 2.0 will change:
> > >
> > > evolution-1.5 -> evolution-2.0
> > >
> > > OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Calendar_Component:1.5 ->
> > > OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Calendar_Component:2.0
> > >
> > > Is this right?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> It might make sense to allow the :1.5 OAFIIDs to continue working if
> you bump the interface version. Making an incompatible change
> evolution's command line interface at the very last minute is the kind
> of thing that would be nice to avoid ...
Well, we realize that we should have been using 2.0 all along. We will
probably release 1.5.94.1 packages for evolution and evolution-exchange
to correct this.
> > > I seems like dependent apps will have to make this change by the hard
> > > code freeze tomorrow.
> >
> > Which apps are using the OAFIID's directly?
>
> The panel launches the calendar and tasks etc. using the command line:
>
> $> evolution -c OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Calendar_Component:1.5
>
-c calendar has been there for months.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]