per-folder options (was: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Mail VPaned vs. HPaned)
- From: guenther <guenther rudersport de>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: Hans Petter Jansson <hpj ximian com>, evolution-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: per-folder options (was: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Mail VPaned vs. HPaned)
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:19:34 +0200
> > * default account (From) when replying (based on open folder)
>
> This isn't that hard to do fwiw.
Probably -- but the hard part will be to come up with a polished UI to
set per-folder options.
> > * signing/encryption
> > * signatures
> > * default folders (different Sent folder)
>
> These should be based on the account selected. Otherwise its going to
> be a nightmare for the user to configure it and a nightmare to code to
> keep everything consistent.
Actually this is already possible by using outgoing filters, isn't it?
Options like this sure must override the accounts default only, if set
at all.
> > * View, Threading, etc. (already implemented, UI adjustment)
>
> ??? what do you mean?
This settings are available by the menu currently. Which is somewhat
confusing, cause they really are per-folder options.
So if we ever get per-folder settings implemented with a proper UI,
those should get in there.
> > * display images in HTML mails
> > * offline folders, spam filtering, filters in general
>
> ??? whats this got to do with it?
>
> You mean select which folders to check for spam? You want to filter
> on all folders?
Actually... Yup, I want to. :)
However, my only use case for filtering on all (nope, just a few ones)
folders would be assigning labels. Cause labels are stored locally
rather than on the IMAP server, I cannot assign them by server
filtering.
Anyway, just a quick thought, though. I am totally aware that this will
cost a lot of resources (bandwidth and CPU) -- and the best solution
would be to store labels on the IMAP server, if supported.
...guenther
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0 ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]