Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel->split in? eds or not

On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 16:34 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 10:57 +0800, Not Zed wrote:

> > > >       * Fewer packages to maintain.
> > > > 

> > > I would add:
> > > 	* a single package for accessing all evolution data.

> > You mean, apart from libsoup, gnome and gtk+ libs, etc :)

> yeah :) that's why it could be a good reason: to avoid increasing the
> set of dependencies.

Well, I guess this is really about adding a lot of deps for Camel users
vs. adding one dep for e-d-s users. The decision will have to be based
on, for each group (camel, e-d-s), the number of persons expected to be
in that group multiplied by the amount of suffering the extra deps will

Camel: Few users * lots of suffering.
e-d-s: Lots of users * little suffering.


I lean towards an independent Camel because I think it's got potential
for a greater user base, though.

Hans Petter

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]