Re: [Evolution-hackers] Roadmap Feedback (LAST CALL)
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm redhat com>
- Cc: Dan Winship <danw novell com>, evolution-hackers ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Roadmap Feedback (LAST CALL)
- Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 13:44:07 -0400
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 13:07 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 12:31 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 11:52 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 16:56 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > > > Last call for Evolution road map feedback.
> > > >
> > > > -JP
> > >
> > > Somewhat late here, but something I'd like to hack on for 2.2 is a
> > > rewrite of the way Evolution stores its configuration information - last
> > > time I looked, it stores hierarchical configuration for the various
> > > objects as single strings in GConf (containing XML streams). I'd prefer
> > > it if the hierarchy was stored in expanded form within the GConf
> > > database as separate keys and values.
> >
> > The problem with this is that there's (currently) no way to express this
> > in a GConf schema. (You could specify properties for a single account,
> > but the only way to have an arbitrary number of something is to have a
> > single list-valued property like we do now.)
>
> Or have the things as subdirectories/subfolders within GConf, and set up
> the schema on-the-fly based on the type of the object?
Possibly, but then you can't get atomic notifications for the object as
a whole afaik.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]