Re: [Evolution-hackers] 2 separate addressbooks? why?

[Chris Toshok <toshok ximian com>]

On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 15:41, Not Zed wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 15:20 -0800, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > Sorry to revive this thread... but as people are going to start using
> > 1.5, it might be good to get this settled.
> > 
> > What I'm suggesting:
> > 
> > 1. We drop the 2 separate local address books and move to 1.  Call it
> > "Contacts".
> > 2. Sometime post 2.0 we add the ability to save searches and have them
> > reflected in the source list.  We can at that point add "Personal" and
> > "Work" back in, as saved searches (those contacts without "Business" as
> > a category and those contacts with "Business" as a category,
> > respectively.)
> 
> Watch the nomenclature, we should definetly use "vFolders".  Outlook
> has this new featuer called "Saved searches" ...

Yeah, "vFolders" would work better.  They would act just like vFolders,
and it would make everything more consistent.

Chris