Re: [Evolution-hackers] The questions about gal evolution-1-4-branch

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

Also, see an earlier email on this list, attached.

On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 03:24, Antonio Xu wrote:
> Hello Mike Kestner,
> 
> This is Antonio Xu, I have a question about gal's evolution-1-4-branch. 
> As I konw,  When Evolution 1.4 released, Ettorte said gal won't branch 
> for evolution 1.4, so we aways working on gal-1.99.8. Recently, I found 
> you have branch a tree for evolution 1.4, and it is seems include some 
> bug fixs and some a11y code, so I want to know, what is the intention of 
> the gal evolution-1.4-branch? Is there have lots of difference between 
> tag 1.99.8 and  evolution-1.4-branch?
> 
> Thanks
> Anto
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

--- Begin Message ---

• From: Mike Kestner <mkestner ximian com>
• To: evolution-hackers lists ximian com, gnome-i18n gnome org
• Subject: [Evolution-hackers] gal branched
• Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:55:23 -0500

Yesterday I created an evolution-1-4-branch for gal.  Obviously, this is
the stable branch for evo 1.4.x bugfixing/translations.

Today, I committed patches to make gal produce libgal-2.2.so and
libgal-a11y-2.2.so on trunk.  Development of the gal-2.1.x release line
for evo 2.0 will now happen on the trunk.  gtkhtml and evolution patches
were also committed to trunk to require gal-2.2.

Thanks,
-- 
Mike Kestner <mkestner ximian com>

_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

--- End Message ---