Re: [Evolution-hackers] CalComponent in CalClient

On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 08:45, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 06:36, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > Hi JP
> > 
> > I need to change now CalClient to use libical directly intead of
> > CalComponent, so that the new code in e-cal-model* does not have to use
> > CalComponent (which will be removed soon).
> We'll do the complete removal incrementally as we have time.
yes, I think it is much easier, and much better to write new code not
using things to be removed.

> > The plan is to replace all CalComponent usage with icalcomponent, and
> > use cal_component_get_icalcomponent from the old code that was using
> > CalComponent. Also, using icalcomponent, the update_objects method seems
> > redundant, since sending a single icalcomponent does the job of updating
> > all components in the VCALENDAR top level case.
> > 
> > I think we can just remove the update_object and rename update_objects
> > to update_object.
> As discussed on IRC I think it makes sense to retain the update_objects
> name since we can actually send a bunch of sub components for update. 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]