Re: Security bounties on Web bugs
- From: Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro igalia com>
- To: Ekaterina Gerasimova <kittykat3756 gmail com>
- Cc: Federico Mena Quintero <federico gnome org>, hub figuiere net, epiphany-list gnome org, "D.S. 'Spider' Ljungmark" <spider gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Security bounties on Web bugs
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 18:35:27 -0600
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Ekaterina Gerasimova <kittykat3756 gmail com> wrote:
The first of the two is to have HTTPS-everywhere by default (see the
EFF plugin for Firefox for an idea[2]). Optionally, it could also
refuse mixed-page content (https site loading http content) with an
overwritable warning or similar. We would like to propose a bounty of
USD 500.00 for full implementation and merging of the feature.
So our questions are: is this something which you would be willing to
accept in Web? Do you consider the bounty to be suitable based on the
difficulty of the issue?
Actually, they seem to have a fairly complex format for creating rules [1]. That would be a more difficult project than I originally assumed.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]