Re: Epiphany extensions, what to do next
- From: Xan Lopez <xan gnome org>
- To: Gustavo Noronha <gns gnome org>
- Cc: epiphany-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Epiphany extensions, what to do next
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:17:56 +0200
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Gustavo Noronha <gns gnome org> wrote:
>> AFAIK using Seed won't automagically give you DOM access, you just
>> happen to be using the same language browsers give people by default
>> to mess with their DOM. What we need is C/GObject to the DOM
>> (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16401), and when that's done
>> both Python and Seed will be able to access it just fine. So unless
>> I'm wrong this is a non-issue in our case.
>
> I've discussed with racarr about enabling Seed to attach to the
> javascript context of webkit itself, which would enable us to make
> arbitrary GObjects available as javascript objects for the page to use,
> and use the javascript objects available in a page in extensions. I am
> not sure this counts as a pro for this specific problem, though, since I
> am not really familiar with how current extensions are limited.
Oh great, I didn't know that could be done or that he was planning to
do it. I guess in that case Seed has another pro in my book :)
Xan
>
> See you,
>
> --
> Gustavo Noronha <gns gnome org>
> GNOME contributor
>
> _______________________________________________
> epiphany-list mailing list
> epiphany-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]