Re: epiphany-list Digest, Vol 51, Issue 5
- From: "Tony Yarusso" <tonyyarusso gmail com>
- To: epiphany-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: epiphany-list Digest, Vol 51, Issue 5
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:19:15 -0500
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Michael Stephenson
<mickstephenson googlemail com> wrote:
>> Hmm, mixed feelings on this. On the one hand, easily accessible
>> extensions are a big part of what has made Firefox so successful, but
>> on the other Epiphany is built on the idea of sane integration, and
>> this sort of thing requires bypassing the package management system.
>> I would prefer seeing some sort of basic functionality built in plus
>> handlers for the major PM types, such as the relatively new apt-url in
>> Debian/Ubuntu that would accomplish both things. (No idea what
>> equivalents are available for RPM and others at this time.)
>
> I'm no dev so forgive me if I am total wrong here, but isn't this exactly
> kind of thing what packagekit and policykit were designed for?
> Is there a way this could be implemented for the distributions which support
> packagekit and optional in the USE flags?
> Mick
No dev here either, but some quick reading makes it sound like you may
be on to something. Hopefully someone on the list has actually worked
with those tools a bit.
--
Tony Yarusso
http://tonyyarusso.com/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]