Re: Opportunity for Epiphany
- From: Jan de Groot <jan jgc homeip net>
- Cc: epiphany-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Opportunity for Epiphany
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:32:48 +0200
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 03:37 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 10/24/2005 02:54 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 23:16 +0200, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> >
> > The trademark issue is a real problem for Debian and Ubuntu because of
> > strict license policy. Archlinux has permission to use the official
> > logos, so it isn't a real issue for us.
> > About XULRunner: do we _NEED_ to be compatible with XUL? I haven't seen
> > a single web application written in XUL yet. Most of the stuff I see is
> > either serverside, ActiveX, Flash or Java.
> >
>
> XULRunner is essentially mozilla.org's codename for "libgecko". It will
> include support for XPCOM, Gecko, core networking. It will also include
> XUL support. You want to be compatible with XULRunner.
>
> Reading material:
> http://wiki.mozilla.org/XUL:Xul_Runner#The_XULRunner_Runtime
Ah, looks nice. So in the near future I can have epiphany without
firefox on my system :)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]