Re: Opportunity for Epiphany



On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 03:37 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 10/24/2005 02:54 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 23:16 +0200, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> >   
> > The trademark issue is a real problem for Debian and Ubuntu because of
> > strict license policy. Archlinux has permission to use the official
> > logos, so it isn't a real issue for us.
> > About XULRunner: do we _NEED_ to be compatible with XUL? I haven't seen
> > a single web application written in XUL yet. Most of the stuff I see is
> > either serverside, ActiveX, Flash or Java.
> >   
> 
> XULRunner is essentially mozilla.org's codename for "libgecko".  It will 
> include support for XPCOM, Gecko, core networking.  It will also include 
> XUL support.  You want to be compatible with XULRunner.
> 
> Reading material: 
> http://wiki.mozilla.org/XUL:Xul_Runner#The_XULRunner_Runtime

Ah, looks nice. So in the near future I can have epiphany without
firefox on my system :)






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]