Easier than Galeon? Don't know, don't care
- From: Geoff Staples <geoff geoffstaples com>
- To: epiphany-list gnome org
- Subject: Easier than Galeon? Don't know, don't care
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:51:57 -0500
It was recommended that we take a look at Epiphany.
So, I tried to install it on Centos 32bit 4 - latest build.
I was using the latest Mozilla browser and opened the Epiphany download
(RH Enterprise 4 RPM) with the RPM installer in the download dialog.
But, I get an unlocatable package error for mozilla.
I've spent over an hour searching the Epiphany website for information
on what to do about this and have found nothing.
I don't mean to sound snotty. But, I'll bet this is a common error and
I'll bet it stops most folks dead in the water when they try to install
Epiphany. In fact, I'll bet most simply say, "To Hell with it" and
simply go away.
I point this out to you because I find this to be typical of much Linux
software: There are a couple of simple things you have to know to get
the software running. But, there will be one critical item for which
there is no explanation and no instructions.
We're trying to put together a Linux desktop replacement for Windows.
But, stuff like this rapidly makes it cheaper to pay the license fees
for Windows and be done with it.
As I said, I don't want to be snotty. Maybe I'm just in a lousy mood
today. But, this is so typical of Linux software and it is precisely
this issue that prevents Linux from over taking Windows.
I commend you for the attempt to create an easy to use, well integrated
Gnome browser. So, I hope (despite my bad mood) that you will suggest a
solution and then publish it. We are motivated to replace Windows with
Linux.
I am the advocate for this approach and convinced fellow executives that
getting rid of Microsoft was a good idea. But, support for this
initiatve is being beaten out of us pretty quickly. Even with 2000
desktop machines, it is looking more and more like paying the licensing
fees for Microsoft is cheaper than the support cost for Linux. ($200,000
for Windows licenses is cheaper than the salaries for Linux support and
the training costs for employees to use Linux instead of Windows.)
It is looking more and more as though the best approach is to use
Windows and then run OpenOffice, Firebird, Firefox, and Sunbird (Or,
Mozilla) on Windows workstations. We can control the security with
centrally administered anti-virus and anti-spyware software and a Linux
pc based firewall.
I don't like that solution and I will lose credibility for backing off
on moving from Windows to Linux, but, a disastrous transition would get
me fired!
Geoff
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]