Re : Re: Downloader design proposal
- From: Marco Pesenti Gritti <mpgritti oltrelinux com>
- To: Adam Hooper <adamh densi com>
- Cc: epiphany-list gnome org, bordoley msu edu, micke imendio com
- Subject: Re : Re: Downloader design proposal
- Date: 17 Jan 2004 09:55:30 -0000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004 Jan 17 - 06:10
Adam Hooper <adamh densi com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>I love this suggestion, I think it's the best compromise there is. One
>tiny suggestion:
>
>Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>| - Confirmation dialog:
>|
>| (Sucky text, it should prolly be something like 1.0 text)
>|
>| It's not possible to open the link directly in the browser. The file
>| will be downloaded.
>|
>| Save As - Cancel - Open (prolly Download when there is no handler).
>|
>| It should be showed when automatic download is off or when the download
>| has been started automatically.
>|
>| - Security Dialog
>|
>| [Text to write.]
>|
>| Cancel - Download
>|
>| It should be showed when the mime type is unsafe.
>
>I'd personally rather have one dialog than two -- especially since I,
>the power user, will probably be downloading quite a few "unsafe" mime
>types (what *is* unsafe, anyway? Executables?).
Yeah when there is an unsafe file only the Security dialog should be showed. It should have a Save As alternate action too, good point.
>I don't know how HIG-ish it is, but I think it would be better if the
>Confirmation dialog had some bold warning text (and maybe if it were a
>warning dialog, complete with image) and 'Cancel' as default when
>opening an unsafe mime type.
Yeah, sounds higgy ;)
Marco
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]