Re: How we can improve our fundraising efforts
- From: Hashem Nasarat <hnasarat gmail com>
- To: alex diavatis <alexis diavatis gmail com>, Karen Sandler <karen gnome org>
- Cc: Engagement list <engagement-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: How we can improve our fundraising efforts
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:58:12 -0400
You raise a good point, Karen. Already Yorba and Elementary are doing
"small specific campaigns"/bug bounties (the way you described it, they
seemed synonymous to me):
http://elementaryos.org/journal/fix-bugs-get-paid
http://blogs.gnome.org/jnelson/tag/bounties/
Also, a highly desired feature for Telepathy has also been around for a
while:
https://freedomsponsors.org/core/issue/333/telepathy-should-support-otr-encryption
It seems like there are two variables in play here, the size/amount of
desired money of fundraiser & whether the fundraiser has specific
goal(s). So we have:
large & vague -- GNOME Privacy
large & specific -- Geary/Pitivi/Mediagoblin crowdfunding (where they
enumerated specific features)
small & vague -- Friend of GNOME
small & specific -- bug bounties
I wonder what is best for GNOME...
On 04/24/2014 12:50 PM, alex diavatis wrote:
Clear goals will also skip the need to check back with donors and tell
them where their money goes.
They will almost instantly know :)
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:48 PM, alex diavatis
<alexis diavatis gmail com <mailto:alexis diavatis gmail com>> wrote:
As an alternative idea, which I am not sure you would really want to
follow,
you can try small and often campaigns over specific highly
anticipated features
For example, we need $3.000 to create folders-application within
Shell overview.
Then you can contact a student to work on it the same way that GSoC
works.
If the feature won't get completed, just refund the donors.
This way you will also save time from the main developers which can
spend time
to work on other things, that you would cover in a less "attractive"
campaigns.
Additionally you can involve more people on GNOME Project, which
they might continue contribute afterwards.
As it actually happens with some GSoC students.
But my opinion is that campaigns should have very very clear goals,
and not be as general as "privacy".
- alex
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Karen Sandler <karen gnome org
<mailto:karen gnome org>> wrote:
On 2014-04-24 05:13, Allan Day wrote:
Oliver Propst <oliver propst gmail com
<mailto:oliver propst gmail com>> wrote:
When we are doing a campaign we tend to be very focused on
it (thus
busy), and not have the resources to focus on more long term
planning.
Thus its a a good time for us now to think about how we can
improve
our fundraising efforts [1]. A great start is to learn how
from how
other free/open source projects have conducted their fundraising
campings.
...
Thanks for getting this started, Oliver. I've been thinking
about this
a bit myself recently, and I'd like to do some work on
Friends of
GNOME if I can find the time. I wanted to discuss it in a team
meeting, but the mailing list works.
yes! The best time to think of this is when there's nothing
pressing going on.
So, some general thoughts:
* One of my main issues with Friends of GNOME right now is
that we
don't do enough to engage with existing donors. If people
donate, the
least they should get back is regular updates about how we are
spending their money. Right now, Friends of GNOME is a black
hole -
people make their donations and that's pretty much it. This
is not an
effective way to encourage people to keep donating or to get
them to
donate more (see below). One obvious thing we should be doing is
sending regular updates to donors, probably as an email (I
wonder if
this could be tied in with the annual report somehow - eg.
quarterly
donor updates could be used as the basis for each annual
report).
I like the idea of a newsletter - the main thing is that we
actually commit to write something on a regular basis. Given how
hard it was to get quarterly reports together I think this is
non-trivial.
* We ought to be looking to existing donors as the potential
source
of additional cash. If someone is making a regular donation, the
chances are that they will also be willing to donate to
periodic fund
raising campaigns. This is the way a lot of charities
operate - once
you are a donor they will contact you about their campaigns.
One thing
we need to do here is separate Friends of GNOME and our fund
raising
campaigns into different entities.
* It doesn't seem like the adopt a hacker postcards and the
t-shirts
are being tracked and distributed very effectively, and I'm not
convinced that we have the administrative capacity to do a
good job of
these. I wonder if we should drop them in favour of other
incentives
that don't have the same administrative burden. Ideas: discount
vouchers, vouchers to spend on GNOME merchandise, freebies at
conferences, membership badges you can download and print at
home.
Actually, thanks to Tobi, this has gotten much much better.
Reminder emails are reliably sent. I know that at least for the
postcards I'm asked to send, I get nagged periodically until
they are sent (though I usually send them right away - I swear!)
* It's time to be thinking about another campaign. When that
happens,
we need to be certain that we will be able to use the money
fairly
quickly - this hasn't happened in the past, and that is
potentially
damaging. (Again, people need feedback about how their money
is being
spent, otherwise they might not donate again.) We should
think about
what we actually need money for, and I'd like the board to
provide us
with some advice here. There are outstanding sysadmin tasks, for
example, like upgrading Bugzilla, or maybe we need to
improve our
infrastructure in some way.
I like this a lot, but we should also consider that the
campaigns are also a way to state our ideals. I think this has
benefited us in the past. Also, I think maybe just keeping
people posted about the plans would help. We don't really have
an informal way to communicate officially. The closest we have
is the GNOME Twitter feed, I guess, but there's nothing on the
website where we can post small updates and musings, etc.
* Aside from the funding campaigns, we don't actively promote or
publicise Friends of GNOME. This is a basic error - we should be
routinely inviting people to join, posting about the scheme, and
advertising what we are doing with donations. This should be
part of
the Engagement Team's regular activities - not just when we
happen to
have a campaign running. A good way to start here would be
to come up
with a plan for what kinds of posts we should be making and
how often
we should be making them; this is something we can check
ourselves
against at each team meeting.
* It seems to me that the Foundation's money goes into a
central pot
- I don't get the impression that particular income is
earmarked for
specific uses. I wonder if the finances could/should be
organised in
such a way that we can definitely say where Friends of GNOME
money is
going, or even channel it to areas that we think are more
interesting
to donors. Again, that's something for the board.
The money technically goes into a single account but the funds
are tracked. For example, I'm pretty sure the GF is still
spending down the Sysadmin FoG campaign amounts.
* Finally, we need data about our existing donors. There
needs to be
a system where we have email and postal addresses so we can
contact
them. We need to know how much they donate and how long they
have been
members for. We need to know how many people are
joining/leaving over
time. We need to know why people are joining/leaving. This will
require new infrastructure, and we need advice from the
board about
what is technically required and how we can get it.
We started to implement CiviCRM, but there were a few reasons
why this wasn't a great solution for GF, including the fact that
we have indefinite donors. Tobi's scripts are capable of
generating this data. For example, he was able to generate a
list of donors who had been giving for two years or more.
Perhaps it's not the most ideal solution but it's something and
he's surely work with us to create regular reporting scripts if
we want them.
Sorry for the long post!
This is great, and thanks to Oliver for starting the discussion!
karen
Allan
_________________________________________________
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list gnome org <mailto:engagement-list gnome org>
https://mail.gnome.org/__mailman/listinfo/engagement-__list
<https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list>
_________________________________________________
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list gnome org <mailto:engagement-list gnome org>
https://mail.gnome.org/__mailman/listinfo/engagement-__list
<https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list>
_______________________________________________
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]