Re: GNOME -> Gnome

[Nelson Marques <07721 ipam pt>]

+1

 I've mailed something only to Dave by mistake regarding some of the
dangers of Re-Branding. 

 Dave, feel free to forward to list, as it was my mistake on not hitting
reply all.

 I pointed before also to Dave the following:

 * If GNOME is expecting some negative feedback on GNOME 3.0, please
take that into considerating when thinking on rebranding, as it might
bring additional negative charge towards users who are already creating
some controversy with gnome-shell for example. Bringing major changes
into play now might be harmful.

 I support Andre's point of view in full. Maybe we need only to do a
small communication establishing what as changed (like the drop of the
acronym, since the other brand aspects are to remain).

 nm

On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:28 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 06.04.2010, 08:08 -0500 schrieb Bharat Kapoor:
> > At least now I know what GNOME is an acronym for :)
> > The talk is about name or rename (if our mission is consistent with)
> > GNU Network Object Model Environment
>
> Once again: GNOME WAS an acronym. GNOME is NOT anymore an acronym.
> GNOME stands for GNOME nowadays. Only. That's all.
>
> andre
>
> -- 
>  mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
>  http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper

-- 
Nelson Marques
PGP Fingerprint: 53E1 731B 85A4 A098 8382 8CFF 1AC7 AF01 7717 8063