Re: release notes: first draft
- From: "Luis Villa" <luis villa gmail com>
- To: "James Henstridge" <james jamesh id au>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Edward Hervey <bilboed gmail com>, Davyd Madeley <davyd madeley id au>, GNOME I18N List <gnome-i18n gnome org>, marketing-list gnome org, Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- Subject: Re: release notes: first draft
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:06:01 -0500
On 3/7/06, James Henstridge <james jamesh id au> wrote:
Edward Hervey wrote:
revised version 0.3.a-beta-pre25-coma-7:
"Gstreamer 0.10 will also give users the possibility to use, where
patents apply, multimedia plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to
offer support for licensed codecs for which no legal plugins are
available."
Does that make more clear the *freedom of choice* offered to users ?
Apart from the freedom issue (which is important), is this actually a
new feature for Gnome 2.14? GStreamer 0.8 also used plugins, so surely
codec vendors had the same ability to offer plugins back then as with 0.10.
Has anything actually changed here other than a vendor (Fluendo) making
use of this ability? If not, then this probably isn't appropriate for
the release notes.
This issue has been a big, ongoing issue for the linux desktop for
years. It certainly seems appropriate to talk about the results now
that our long-term strategic choices have blossomed.
Luis
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]