Re: release notes: first draft
- From: "Edward Hervey" <bilboed gmail com>
- To: "Edward Hervey" <bilboed gmail com>, "Davyd Madeley" <davyd madeley id au>, "GNOME I18N List" <gnome-i18n gnome org>, marketing-list gnome org, "GNOME Desktop Hackers" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: release notes: first draft
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 13:44:08 +0000
Hi,
I didn't mention any specific country, nor the whole world I just
said "for which no legal plugins are available." which seemed to be
the most neutral way of putting it.\
I could go on very long about the quality/benifits of licensed and
unlicensed codecs, but I think the strong point here is that it
*allows* both for everybody's benefits (nothing *forces* you to
download/use them AFAIK).
Edward
On 3/7/06, Tommi Vainikainen <tvainika niksula cs hut fi> wrote:
On 2006-03-07T11:34:25+0200, bilboed gmail com wrote:
GStreamer 0.10 will also allow users to take advantage of multimedia
plugins distributed by 3rd party vendors to offer support for licensed
codecs for which no legal plugins are available. These may include
support for AC3, WMA, MP3 and more. A licensed, yet freely available,
MP3 plugin for GStreamer 0.10 has already been made available by
Fluendo, a long-time supporter of GStreamer.
For me this seems bit U.S. centric. In many countries (even Western
countries) reverse engineering is allowed. In many more countries
there are no patents restricting those file formats. Therefore
codes/plugins are most likely "illegal" only in U.S. and some other
countries, but not all over the world.
--
Tommi Vainikainen
--
Edward Hervey
Junior developer / Fluendo S.L.
http://www.pitivi.org/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]