Re: WGO structure

[Joachim Noreiko <jnoreiko yahoo com>]

--- Claus Schwarm <c schwarm gmx net> wrote:

> The structure lacks a portal for third-party
> developers: This is
> GNOME's most important product. The desktop has no
> real selling points
> unless lots of third-party dev's use the dev.
> platform. 

Fair enough. Could you add something to the plan for
this? It's completely outside my experiences, so I
have no idea what is needed.

> We don't need a whole portal for contributors.
> Contributors cannot be
> convinced by a few web pages. They grow slowly into
> helping. And most of
> them are hardcore enthusiasts and geeks, anyway, so
> they can deal with
> live.gnome.org as a portal for contributors.

I can live with that.
But something has to be done about live.g.o's
ugliness.
Would you then mention contributing on the community
page?
 
> Next, I'm not quite sure whether it makes sense to
> sort gnomefiles and
> art.gnome site by site to the LiveCD, the release
> notes, and the
> sources.

I wasn't sure about that either.... Quim persuaded me.
Where would you put the links to those sites?
I had a top-level section for 'cool things to do with
your gnome', but the only things I could think of were
art and gnomefiles... which doesn't make very many things.


        
        
                
___________________________________________________________ 
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine 
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html