Re: gnome app pages (was confusingly Gnome Software Map)




--- Gezim Hoxha <gezimetc shaw ca> wrote:

On Sat, 2006-05-08 at 12:49 +0200, Gergely Nagy
wrote:
Hi,

Hi.


All right, so let's get back to basics :)

We seem to need to do this, every now and then.


Clearly, for these pages to make some sense at
all, there has to be some
added value. Let's try to enumerate these first...

- authoritative
by this i mean it will be the hopefully best
maintained and relevant
info source on an application relevant to gnome.
People will of course
be free to create an "official" website for their
app, and publish it as
they see fit. Yet, the wgo app pages would appear
in a more-or-less
uniform fashion, with some established guidelines.
It will be possible
to make it a collaborative effort, where several
people can make sure
the page is up do date and meeting some standards.
Perhaps the "official" web page will be more
up-to-date, because
Changelogs appear within microseconds of a
release, but people browsing
wgo/apps will hopefully get a uniform and still
valid resource to
discover gnome apps.

OK. With this, I disagree. We're basically wanting
developers and/or
volunteers to duplicate the information they have
about the project.

<snip>


Why can't it be the project page. Why can't we
integrate the development
efforts with the main project page? My goal is to
not have duplicate
information it just clogs up the Internet tubes.

It's not duplication.
It's two different channels.

Most users can't code.
Suppose I'm an orddinary user. Maybe I've just
installed Ubuntu and I want to know more about this
gnome thing, maybe I've just heard of GNOME and I'm
curious.
I go to the GNOME home page, and from there I go to a
page about an app -- say rhythmbox, because I like my
MP3s (yeah, there's a whole other kettle of fish
there, but leaving that aside for now...)
If I see a page that's predominantly about roadmaps,
bugzilla, IRC channels, and the like, I'm going to
think that this GNOME thing is for people who can
code. It's not for me.

Basically, what we currently have is info about a
particular app split like this:

project ----------------------------- | wiki
intro, screenshots, contact, download | roadmap,
ideas, etc

I think the split should be like this:

wgo/app ---- | projects
intro, shots | contact, download, roadmap, ideas

That of course requires 'projects' to be a CMS that's
as easy to update quickly as the wiki currently is.
But that's detail :)


        
        
                
___________________________________________________________ 
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine 
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]