Re: Four (open-source) Greek fonts are now available, and why it's relevant
- From: Simos Xenitellis <simos74 gmx net>
- To: Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>
- Cc: marketing list <marketing-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Four (open-source) Greek fonts are now available, and why it's relevant
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 02:33:44 +0100
Luis Villa wrote:
So, a more detailed followup to my first 'ooh, cool' post, and moving
to board a bit
I would love to do a press release, but it obviously opens up
questions of 'when will bitstream vera sans 1.0.1 come out?', which we
don't have answers to :)
Also, as far as I can tell (and please correct me if I'm wrong, Simos)
the only link to gnome here is that these fonts use the same license
as the fonts at gnome.org/fonts/, correct? That is an awfully tenous
link to market around, it seems to me, but I'm open to convincing?
A press release by the GNOME Foundation would be nice, though I too
believe the link with this font
announcement may not be strong enough.
The real benefit from the GNOME Foundation efforts is with the Copyright
text, found at http://www.gnome.org/fonts/
In general it's cumbersome to make fonts available as free software.
The easy way is to simply include the GPL text in the tarball. However,
in many cases, fonts are donations from commercial
entities who would like some sort of "minor" restrictions to the use of
the fonts, as described in the Bitstream Vera copyright.
There are many fonts on the Web which are described as "free" ("free,
but for personal use only", "free for use with this application only",
"free but do not modify", etc) but are not suitable to be included in
Linux distributions.
For example, CODE2001 (http://home.att.net/~jameskass/code2001.htm)
includes glyphs (characters) for many Unicode ranges that no GPL font
exists yet,
covering most of the empty spaces in the BMP and Plane 1 planes. The
author mentions that he does not want modifications to the font
which is fair enough, and the Bitstream Vera-style copyright enforces
just this restriction; you can add/change glyphs as long as you change
the name to the resulting new font. Third-parties are encouraged to
contact the author of the font regarding additions/corrections they may
have so no forking takes place.
Therefore, an interesting task I can see is to make a document with
simple guidelines on releasing fonts as open-source
1. Is the GPL suitable for you? If so, release as GPL, add gpl.txt to
the tarball, edit the font header and that's it.
2. If not, use a Bitstream Vera-style license, edit the Copyright
document by filling in the placeholders, [do some extra work], add
copyright.txt to the tarball, edit font header and that's it.
3. After both 1. and 2., make them available to the Debian project (if
debian accepts the fonts, every distro can use (tm)) with a ttf-xxxx
name. See http://lyre.mit.edu/debian/pool/main/t/ for all the
ttf-xxxxxxx packages.
4. Publicise to a list of font sources.
/me thinks out loud...
Maybe we could move all the fonts to freedesktop, move the mailing
list there, get them hosted there, and include these other two fonts
with the same license at the same place (ideally), and do some press
around that? That seems like a much better place than gnome.org for
them, realistically, from a technical/organizational point of view,
anyway.
I believe that most fonts can be served at their individual Web sites.
In general, they are bound to have copies at their
http://lyre.mit.edu/debian/pool/main/t/ttf-xxxxxxx repository which is
ideal source for other distributions to grab from.
For the mgopen fonts, the individual location is
http://www.ellak.gr/fonts/mgopen/, the Debian repository is
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/x11/ttf-mgopen
I believe that making a guide on releasing fonts by the GNOME Foundation
or some other organisation would be a good step to get more fonts made
open-source.
Based on this guide we could have press releases to the sort "New
open-source font made available, thanks to our guide". With luck, more
donations of fonts will take place.
Hope this long e-mail makes sense!
Simos
Luis (who has gotten into the bad habit of brainstorming aloud on lists :)
On 5/15/05, Simos Xenitellis <simos74 gmx net> wrote:
Hi,
Just to announce the availability of four Greek fonts, at
http://www.ellak.gr/fonts/mgopen/
Why it matters to the marketing list?
There are limited non-latin fonts which are distributed as open-source.
It's important to populate the list of available open-source fonts for a
language, as they can be made available on any Linux distribution. A
graphical environment (such as GNOME) is made more appealing to the
end-user if there are beautiful fonts available.
Until now, Greek GNOME users had freefont (FreeSerif and FreeSans) as
the only good quality proportional fonts for the graphical interface.
All, these fonts were previously commercial and got recently donated.
The licence process chosen was that of the Bitstream Vera fonts, at
http://www.gnome.org/fonts/ initiated by the GNOME Foundation.
Another example of a font distributed with a Bitstream Vera-style
license is Nafees Web Naskh (http://crulp.org/nafeesWebNaskh.html).
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.11 - Release Date: 16/05/2005
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]